Have summaries of our latest blogs delivered to your inbox, so you can stay up to date on the topics and current events that matter to your business.
What’s your strategy for uncovering intelligence that can give you an edge in the market? We’ve all experienced the transformative power of data and algorithms when using Google, streaming...
In 2021, a McKinsey survey revealed that 80% of organizations were prioritizing new business building to better adapt to disruption and shifts in demand. Market intelligence metrics play a crucial role...
For businesses in the nonprofit industry that rely on donor funding, one of the biggest hurdles can be finding donors in the first place. While your institution may have a set group of reliable givers...
Distinguishing between brand identity and corporate identity can be challenging, as the average retail consumer may not be aware of (or interested in) the corporate ownership of products they use every...
Recent years have shed light on the criticality (and fragility) of the global supply chain , due to the pandemic, geopolitical tensions, and economic repercussions of inflation, to name a few. Maintaining...
There have been major developments driving rapid regulatory changes across the world with regards to financial crime monitoring.
In this blog, we explore seven ways companies should respond to these emerging regulatory risks. Implementing these best practices for compliance and due diligence will not only help companies to meet regulators’ expectations, but it should protect their business from the growing complexity of risk.
This might seem obvious advice, but it is important that companies understand the current regulatory framework in all jurisdictions in which they, their third parties and their customers operate. Not only that, but they should monitor legislative proposals and national debates within each jurisdiction to gain an understanding of the likely direction of travel for financial crime regulations in the future.
Legal sources and media articles are useful sources for this information, as well as seeking advice from country experts.
MORE: What companies can learn from recent regulatory action
Although it’s crucial to comply with the requirements of every relevant regulation, this is no longer enough for companies to satisfy regulatory expectations. Instead of approaching regulations like a ‘tick-box’ exercise, firms should understand and implement the best practices around due diligence and financial crime policies and processes.
FATF’s recommendations and the Wolfsberg Principles for banks are two good sources of advice. This approach works best when compliance is treated as a priority by the board and senior management, and training and guidance is offered to all employees–not just left to the compliance team.
Companies that take a holistic approach to compliance from the top down can be confident that, when more regulatory change inevitably comes, they are better prepared because they are already taking the right steps to identify and mitigate risks.
The spread of global financial crime regulations has been accompanied by a sharp growth in fines by enforcement agencies. Banks and other financial institutions received 50% higher fines for financial crime breaches in 2022 than they were in 2021, according to Fenergo. Companies that fail to meet requirements therefore face greater financial and regulatory risks than ever before.
The global economic downturn since the onset of the pandemic has forced many companies to seek to cut costs, and compliance can superficially appear a tempting target because it does not directly generate income. But cutting the compliance budget is a grave error for any company. The risk of a fine for a breach, as well as the reputational impact on the business, far outweighs the cost of investment in compliance. Moreover, compliance has been shown to provide opportunities for companies, including attracting customers and investors who seek to buy from and invest in more transparent and ethical firms.
MORE: 9 crucial steps to prevent costly sanction breaches
Combating financial crimes has become a regulatory priority across the world – not just in the US as may have been the case 20 years ago. In recent years, many countries have introduced new risk assessments and regulations across the Asia-Pacific region, South America, and the Middle East.
Companies therefore need to be able to carry out due diligence on their third parties and suppliers covering every jurisdiction in the world in which they operate. They need access to reliable sources from multiple countries, as well as translations to understand the full picture from these sources across many languages.
Technology is at the heart of recent trends around tracking financial crime. Criminals are using technology in increasingly sophisticated ways–the use of some crypto exchanges is one such example. In turn, regulators are responding by using technology to gain greater visibility of companies’ due diligence processes and to identify suspicious activity.
Moreover, experts predict a fast-approaching trend for companies’ compliance approach is that regulators will require them to use technological tools to monitor for criminal financial activity. Most executives who responded to Kroll’s 2023 Financial Crime Survey predicted regulators will look more closely at how they use technology for compliance in 2023-24.
As a result, companies are advised to invest in technological tools that can help them to identify suspected risks more quickly, accurately, and cost-effectively. For example:
MORE: How risk managers benefit from using quality data
Regulations are changing all the time, and so are financial crime risks depending on a company’s industry or jurisdiction. Most regulations therefore require companies to carry out monitoring of risk on an ongoing basis, rather than doing it once and deciding they are compliant.
Technology platforms like Nexis® Diligence+ can help with this by automatically flagging any changes in risk profiles of companies and their third parties based on large datasets of financial, company, and news records.
Several recent regulations have mandated companies to report on their financial crime monitoring activities and their suspicions of a compliance breach. While digital platforms recently set up by regulators in the Netherlands and Singapore require banks to share information on customers’ risks–both between each other, and with the regulators. Additionally, compliance teams that produce regular reports for their management are usually more likely to secure buy-in on necessary actions.
All of this puts a premium on companies being able to access accurate information and produce clear reports on their monitoring processes and due diligence assessments, with a link back to the dataset or source for the information.
Technological tools like Nexis® Solutions can also help with this process by instantly pulling tailored, risk-scored reports from the database and sending them to users for onward distribution to managers, companies, and regulators. This saves considerable manual staff time and effort that would otherwise be required.
Looking for more tips on how to implement an effective due diligence operation to identify and manage money laundering risks? Check out our Due Diligence Checklist for complete compliance information.