By Simon Weierman Lawyers must rely on the accuracy and quality of their legal research when providing counsel to clients, drafting business agreements or writing legal documents for submission to the...
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta fired the latest shot in the recent acceleration of U.S. antitrust enforcement August 5 with a dramatic ruling that Google has violated federal antitrust law by monopolizing...
The proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology has taken most of the oxygen out of the room in corporate offices. Virtually every major company has aggressively investigated how...
By Geoffrey D. Ivnik, Esq. | Director of Large Markets, LexisNexis Leaders of America’s largest law firms have decided to move full speed ahead with the adoption of generative artificial intelligence...
By Geoffrey D. Ivnik, Esq. | Director of U.S. Large Markets, LexisNexis Law firm leaders perceive that generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) technology is going to have a dramatic impact on how...
Judges in state and federal courts generally agree that during COVID times, virtual litigation is the only way to keep the U.S. court system moving forward. And while it’s not ideal to litigate remotely—for example, there’s no guarantee that remote jurors are actually paying attention to the case—it is necessary. It’s unclear when in-person litigation will be an option again, so virtual litigation is likely here to stay (at least for a while).
Although it’s not perfect, there are some positives to virtual litigation. Some jurors, for example, have reported that Zoom makes it easier to see a witness’s face (versus sitting far away from them in a physical courtroom). For the same reason, they also report being able to see evidence or exhibits more clearly.
Even if you’ve managed to avoid remote litigation thus far, chances are that before long, it will be every litigator’s reality. As with any new endeavor, it’s important to do your homework beforehand and come to the table prepared. Here are some tips that can set you up for success before entering a virtual courtroom.
1. Presenting evidence and exhibits:
2. Navigating breakout rooms and waiting rooms:
Treat breakout rooms and waiting rooms like you would the real thing. For example, while sitting in a virtual waiting room with opposing counsel while you wait for the judge to take your case, consider using that time to discuss the case just as you would in the courthouse hallway. Making the most of your time is key, virtual or not. Also be aware that video or audio recording could continue during breaks or in breakout rooms, so don’t get too comfortable.
3. Juggling rules specific to jurisdiction or judge:
Be sure to take time to research the rules of your jurisdiction or judge ahead of time, such as the swearing in of witnesses. Some court reporters (depending on location) will not swear in a witness if they cannot do so in person. Similarly, check your judge’s website to see if he or she has any special procedures for Zoom hearings. Different judges may have preferences for things such as mute procedures, presenting evidence, and recording rules. For example, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California prohibits the recording of court proceedings held by video or teleconference.
4. Making sure the transcriptionist knows who is speaking:
It may seem basic, but it’s easy to forget in the middle of a heated trial: it’s exceedingly important to identify yourself before speaking so that there is no confusion on the record. Also be sure to speak slowly in case there is some lag in the audio—this will help the stenographer get an accurate transcript.
While virtual court proceedings are inconvenient and require more planning, by the time you’ve had your third or fourth remote appearance, these elements will start to become second nature.